Answers602-840-4101
Home/Arizona Probate Answers/Can You Contest a Will in Arizona?

Arizona probate guidance · Page 16

Can You Contest a Will in Arizona?

Start the Arizona Probate Information Form

Yes.

But being unhappy with a will and having a legal basis to contest it are two very different things.

A parent is generally allowed to leave children unequal shares. A parent can leave property to one child and not another. A parent can change an earlier estate plan. And a will does not become invalid simply because family members believe it is unfair.

A successful Arizona will contest generally requires a legally recognized reason to challenge the validity of the will. That might involve questions about mental capacity, undue influence, proper execution, revocation, fraud, duress, or whether another valid will should control.

Timing also matters. Arizona probate law contains different deadlines depending on what has occurred in the probate and what notices were actually received.

At The Law Offices of Jeffrey D. Lynch, we help Arizona families evaluate disputed wills, determine whether there is a legitimate basis for a challenge, and understand the risks and practical consequences of probate litigation.

Can I Contest a Will Because It Is Unfair?

Usually, unfairness by itself is not enough.

Suppose Dad has three children. His will leaves 80% of his estate to Daughter A and 10% each to Sons B and C.

Sons B and C may believe that is terribly unfair. But the question in a will contest is not simply:

“Was the will fair?”

The question is:

“Is the will legally valid?”

A person who has testamentary capacity generally has substantial freedom to decide who receives that person's property at death. The fact that the distribution surprises or disappoints family members does not automatically invalidate the will.

Who Has the Mental Capacity to Make a Will in Arizona?

Arizona law provides that a person who is eighteen years of age or older and who is of sound mind may make a will.

In a contested estate, the issue can be much more complicated.

An older person can have memory problems, physical illness, or cognitive decline without necessarily lacking testamentary capacity at the relevant time. The critical issue generally focuses on the person's capacity when the will was executed.

Medical records, witnesses, the drafting attorney, and the person's conversations and conduct around the time of execution may all become important. A diagnosis by itself does not necessarily answer the legal question.

Does Dementia Automatically Make a Will Invalid?

No.

A diagnosis of dementia or another cognitive condition does not automatically establish that every legal document signed by that person is invalid.

Suppose Mom has been diagnosed with early dementia. She still recognizes her children, understands that she owns a house and investment accounts, understands that she is signing a will, and understands how she wants her property distributed.

The existence of a diagnosis does not by itself tell us whether the will is valid.

On the other hand, severe cognitive impairment around the time of execution may provide important evidence in a capacity challenge. The question requires more than a medical label.

What Is Undue Influence?

Undue influence is one of the most common allegations in disputed estates.

The concern is that the will reflects another person's improper influence rather than the decedent's own voluntary estate plan.

For example, Dad has always planned to divide his estate equally among his three children. Late in life, Dad becomes increasingly dependent on Daughter A. Daughter A begins controlling his transportation, finances, medical appointments, and access to other family members. A new will is then signed leaving nearly everything to Daughter A.

That does not automatically prove undue influence. But it raises questions worth investigating.

Who arranged for the new will? Who selected or contacted the lawyer? Was Daughter A present during discussions? Was Dad isolated from other family members? What was Dad's physical and mental condition? Did the new plan represent a dramatic departure from prior wills? Who benefited from the change?

The complete circumstances matter.

If My Sister Took Mom to the Lawyer, Is the Will Invalid?

Not automatically.

Adult children frequently help elderly parents with transportation, scheduling, and appointments. The fact that Daughter drove Mom to the estate-planning attorney does not itself prove undue influence.

The concern becomes greater when the beneficiary who receives the increased benefit is deeply involved in creating the new estate plan—for example, by selecting the attorney, communicating the dispositive terms, isolating the parent, participating in confidential discussions, keeping possession of documents, or otherwise exercising substantial control over the process.

No single fact necessarily decides the case.

Who Has to Prove That a Will Is Invalid?

Arizona law contains specific burden-of-proof rules for contested wills and other governing instruments.

A.R.S. § 14-2712 generally places the initial burden on the person asserting the validity of a governing instrument to establish prima facie proof of due execution. A person challenging the instrument generally bears the burden of establishing revocation.

Arizona law also contains important rules concerning lack of capacity, undue influence, fraud, duress, mistake, and revocation. In certain circumstances, Arizona law creates a rebuttable presumption of undue influence.

The burden analysis can therefore be more complicated than simply saying:

“The person challenging the will has to prove everything.”

When Does Arizona Presume Undue Influence?

Arizona's governing-instrument statute identifies circumstances in which a rebuttable presumption of undue influence may arise.

This can include situations involving a person who had a confidential relationship with the person who created the governing instrument, was active in procuring its creation and execution, and is a principal beneficiary. The statute also addresses certain situations involving the preparer of the governing instrument or the preparer's close relatives.

The precise statutory requirements matter. A confidential relationship alone does not automatically invalidate a will. Neither does being a beneficiary.

But when the statutory elements are present, the presumption can significantly affect the litigation.

What Does “Rebuttable Presumption” Mean?

It does not mean the will automatically loses.

It means Arizona law changes how the undue-influence issue is treated once the statutory requirements for the presumption have been established. The person defending the governing instrument has an opportunity to rebut the presumption.

That is why evidence surrounding execution can become so important. A carefully documented estate-planning process involving independent advice, private communications with the testator, and evidence of the testator's wishes may look very different from a document created almost entirely through the beneficiary who receives the bulk of the estate.

Can a Will Be Contested Because It Wasn't Properly Signed?

Yes.

Arizona has statutory requirements for executing wills.

A conventional paper will generally must be in writing, signed by the testator—or in the testator's name by another person in the testator's conscious presence and at the testator's direction—and signed by at least two witnesses who satisfy the statutory requirements.

Arizona also recognizes holographic wills and electronic wills under separate statutory provisions.

So the fact that a document does not look like a traditional attorney-prepared will does not automatically mean it is invalid. But execution problems can create legitimate grounds for contest.

What Is a Holographic Will?

A holographic will is generally a handwritten will that qualifies under Arizona's separate statutory requirements.

Arizona law can recognize a holographic will even though it does not satisfy all of the ordinary witness requirements for a conventional will, provided the statutory requirements for a holographic will are satisfied.

Dad may have a professionally prepared will from ten years ago. After his death, someone finds a handwritten document in his desk dated two years ago.

The family may then have to determine whether that handwritten document is a valid holographic will and, if it is, what effect it has on the earlier estate plan.

Do not assume the professionally prepared document automatically wins merely because it looks more formal.

What If We Find Two Different Wills?

That does not necessarily mean there is a contest.

People commonly replace older wills with newer ones.

The first questions are: Which document was executed later? Was the later document validly executed? Did it revoke the earlier will? Was the later will itself revoked? Does either document contain provisions that remain effective?

Arizona has statutes governing revocation and revival of wills. Sometimes determining which document controls is straightforward. Sometimes it requires a formal testacy proceeding.

Can Someone Destroy a Will and Revoke It?

Arizona recognizes revocation by certain physical acts when the statutory requirements are satisfied.

A will or part of a will can also be revoked by executing a subsequent will that expressly revokes the earlier document or contains inconsistent provisions.

But finding a torn photocopy or hearing that Dad once said, “I don't like that will anymore,” does not necessarily answer whether the will was legally revoked.

The circumstances of the alleged revocation matter.

What If the Original Will Cannot Be Found?

A missing original does not automatically mean there is no will.

Arizona law contains procedures concerning lost and missing wills. The court may need to determine whether the will existed, whether it was properly executed, what its terms were, and whether it was revoked.

This can become particularly important when the family has a copy of the will but cannot locate the signed original.

A missing original can raise evidentiary issues that should be evaluated before assuming the estate must proceed as though the decedent died without a will.

Can Fraud or Duress Invalidate a Will?

Potentially, yes.

Arizona's burden-of-proof statute expressly addresses fraud and duress along with undue influence, mistake, lack of capacity, and revocation.

Fraud might involve intentionally deceiving the testator about a material fact in a way that affects the estate plan. Duress involves improper coercion.

These are not simply labels to attach to an estate plan someone dislikes. A successful challenge requires evidence connecting the alleged misconduct to the governing instrument.

What If Dad Made a Mistake in His Will?

Mistake can raise issues, but not every drafting problem means the entire will is invalid.

Arizona law provides remedies in certain circumstances involving governing instruments, and interpretation or reformation issues can differ from a traditional contest seeking to invalidate the entire will.

A dispute about what a particular provision means is not necessarily the same case as alleging that Dad lacked capacity to make any will.

Identifying the actual legal issue is important before deciding what relief to request from the probate court.

How Do You Actually Contest a Will in Arizona?

A will contest generally requires a formal testacy proceeding in the Arizona Superior Court.

Arizona's Probate Code provides procedures for contested formal testacy matters. The court may determine whether the decedent left a valid will, whether a particular instrument should be admitted to probate, and other issues concerning testacy.

If objections are filed, the matter can become contested litigation involving pleadings, disclosure, documents, depositions, witnesses, expert testimony, evidentiary hearings, and ultimately a court ruling.

A will contest is not simply a letter to the personal representative saying:

“I object to the will.”

How Long Do I Have to Contest a Will in Arizona?

The deadline depends on what has happened in the probate and what notices you received.

If a will has been admitted through informal probate and an heir or devisee receives the information required by A.R.S. § 14-3306, that person generally has four months from receipt of the information to commence a formal testacy proceeding contesting that probate. After that period, the statute generally bars that heir or devisee from contesting the informal probate, although the statute contains an exception for a later-discovered will.

If the required information was not received, different time limits apply under A.R.S. § 14-3108. Those limits can extend substantially longer.

The important point is not to assume that everyone has two years—or that everyone has four months. The deadline depends on the probate proceeding and the notice actually received.

Do not wait until the estate is ready to distribute before talking to an attorney if you believe the will is invalid.

What Does A.R.S. § 14-3108 Say About the Deadline?

Arizona also has an ultimate-time-limit statute governing probate, testacy, and appointment proceedings.

Among its provisions, A.R.S. § 14-3108 states that a proceeding to contest an informally probated will and secure appointment of the person with legal priority if the contest succeeds may be commenced within the later of twelve months from the informal probate or two years from the decedent's death.

But that does not erase the more specific four-month bar that can apply to an heir or devisee who actually received the information required by A.R.S. § 14-3306.

That is why the correct deadline cannot be determined simply by counting two years from the date of death. We need to know what was filed, when the will was admitted, what notice was provided, and when it was received.

What Happens to the Personal Representative While the Will Is Being Contested?

That depends on the procedural circumstances and the orders entered in the probate.

A dispute over the will does not mean the estate's property can simply be ignored. The house may need insurance. Bills may need attention. Property may need to be protected.

Arizona probate law provides mechanisms for maintaining estate administration while testacy and appointment disputes are resolved.

In some situations, the personal representative's authority may be affected or limited while a formal proceeding is pending. The court's orders and the particular proceeding matter.

What Evidence Is Important in a Will Contest?

The answer depends on the legal theory.

For a capacity or undue-influence case, useful evidence may include medical records, prior wills and trusts, communications with the drafting attorney, emails and text messages, financial records, witness testimony, records showing who arranged appointments, evidence concerning the decedent's relationships, changes in the estate plan, evidence of isolation or dependence, and information about the circumstances surrounding execution.

The best evidence is often created before anyone knows there will be litigation.

That is why preserving records quickly can be important.

Can the Lawyer Who Drafted the Will Be a Witness?

Potentially.

In a contested estate, the drafting attorney may have important information concerning the testator's capacity, instructions, intentions, execution of the documents, and who participated in the estate-planning process.

Other witnesses may include the witnesses to the will, medical providers, caregivers, family members, friends, financial professionals, and others who interacted with the decedent around the relevant time.

The credibility and relevance of the evidence matter more than simply the number of witnesses each side can produce.

Does a Self-Proved Will Make It Impossible to Contest?

No.

A self-proved will can simplify proof concerning execution. Arizona permits wills to be made self-proved through statutory procedures involving acknowledgments and witness affidavits.

But self-proving a will does not make it immune from every possible challenge. Issues such as undue influence, capacity, fraud, duress, revocation, or the existence of another controlling instrument may still arise.

“Self-proved” does not mean “uncontestable.”

What Is a No-Contest Clause?

Some wills contain a provision intended to penalize a beneficiary who contests the will.

Under A.R.S. § 14-2517, a provision in a will purporting to penalize an interested person for contesting the will or instituting another proceeding relating to the estate is unenforceable if probable cause exists for instituting the proceeding.

That does not mean a beneficiary should ignore a no-contest clause.

Before filing a challenge, the beneficiary should understand both the potential basis for the contest and the possible consequences.

What Happens If the Will Contest Is Successful?

That depends on what the court determines.

The challenged will might be denied probate. An earlier valid will might control. A later-discovered will might be admitted. The estate might pass partly or entirely through intestacy if there is no valid controlling will. Or the court may resolve a narrower issue without invalidating the entire estate plan.

That is why the desired outcome should be considered before spending substantial money litigating.

A person should ask not only:

“Can I challenge this will?”

but also:

“What happens if I win?”

What Happens If I Lose the Will Contest?

The challenged will may remain in effect, and the parties may have incurred substantial legal fees and costs.

Depending on the circumstances, attorney-fee statutes, probate provisions, or provisions of the governing instrument may also become relevant.

Will contests can involve extensive discovery, medical records, depositions, expert witnesses, and evidentiary hearings.

Before filing, it is worth evaluating the strength of the evidence, the amount actually at stake, the likely cost of litigation, and the practical result of winning.

Can We Settle a Will Contest?

Yes.

Many contested probate matters resolve without a final trial.

Sometimes the parties negotiate directly through counsel. Sometimes mediation is useful. Arizona law also recognizes written agreements among successors concerning estate interests, subject to statutory requirements.

Settlement can provide flexibility that a judge may not have after trial. The parties might resolve disputes concerning distributions, real property, personal property, expenses, or other estate issues as part of a comprehensive agreement.

A settlement must be properly structured, particularly when the rights of creditors, nonparticipating beneficiaries, minors, or other interested persons may be affected.

Should I Contest Mom's Will?

That is ultimately a legal and economic decision, not just an emotional one.

Start with four questions:

What is the legal basis for the challenge?

What evidence supports it?

What is the deadline?

What do I receive if the challenge succeeds?

Those questions can quickly separate a potentially legitimate will contest from a case based primarily on disappointment or family conflict.

Being disinherited may provide a strong financial reason to investigate. But it does not itself provide the legal ground for a contest. The evidence still has to support a recognized basis for challenging the will.

I Think an Arizona Will Is Invalid. What Should I Do?

Do not wait.

Obtain a copy of the will. Determine whether probate has already been opened. Find out whether the will has been admitted informally or formally. Preserve prior wills, trusts, emails, text messages, medical information, and other relevant records.

And determine exactly when any probate notices were received.

The deadline can become just as important as the merits of the case.

Need Help Contesting or Defending an Arizona Will?

At The Law Offices of Jeffrey D. Lynch, we help Arizona families evaluate disputed wills and contested probate matters.

If you believe a will resulted from undue influence, lack of capacity, improper execution, fraud, duress, revocation, or another legal problem—or if you are the personal representative or beneficiary defending a will—the first step is determining what happened, what evidence exists, and what deadlines apply.

Not every unfair-looking will is invalid.

But when there is a legitimate problem, waiting too long can eliminate options that otherwise might have been available.

Request an Arizona Probate Consultation

This page provides general information about Arizona law and is not legal advice. Will contests are highly fact-specific and may be subject to short procedural deadlines. The validity of a particular will depends on the document, circumstances surrounding its execution, applicable statutes, probate proceedings, notices, evidence, and court orders.

Authoritative sources